18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Short comparison: the Toyo Celsius AS2 (54%) and the Firestone Multiseason 2 (56%) are both positioned as all‑round / multiseason solutions, but tests show they follow different priorities. Neither model has a listed direct replacement at the time of testing.


Test positions and overall result: across the available test programmes (AUTOBILD, ADAC and other lab comparisons) the Firestone generally ranks marginally ahead. Example placements: AUTOBILD/ADAC runs show Firestone at positions like 11–22 and ADAC 8/16, while Toyo sits around 11–12/16 or lower in larger AUTOBILD fields. Combined with the small difference in our aggregate scores (56% vs 54%), the Firestone Multiseason 2 is the overall winner by a narrow margin.


What the tests say — strengths


  • Toyo Celsius AS2 – praised repeatedly for high mileage, very good price/value and comfortable ride with low exterior noise. Several tests highlight strong aquaplaning resistance and long wear life, making it a good choice if you prioritise economy and comfort.

  • Firestone Multiseason 2 – scores best for wet handling, very good snow grip and consistently low rolling resistance. Tests note excellent behaviour on wet laps and strong performance in snow tests, which helps fuel efficiency and winter safety.


What the tests say — weaknesses


  • Toyo Celsius AS2 – several test reports point to average winter qualities, understeer on snow and wet surfaces, delayed steering response on wet roads and prolonged wet braking distances. If winter handling precision and shortest wet braking are priorities, Toyo shows limits.

  • Firestone Multiseason 2 – despite its wet and snow strengths, Firestone is criticised for extended dry braking distances, slightly below‑average comfort and mixed notes on aquaplaning reserves in some tests. Some test years also reported inconsistent treadwear/longevity.


Head‑to‑head summary: On pure safety metrics for wet and snowy conditions the Firestone pulls ahead thanks to better wet handling and superior snow grip, while the Toyo wins on cost‑per‑kilometre, comfort and aquaplaning reserves. In mixed real‑world use the Firestone’s strength on wet and snow combined with lower rolling resistance makes it the more balanced performer overall; the Toyo is the better value and longer‑lasting option if you prioritise mileage and ride comfort.


Verdict: choose the Firestone Multiseason 2 if you want the slightly better all‑round safety in wet and snowy conditions and lower rolling resistance. Opt for the Toyo Celsius AS2 if your priorities are longevity, price/value and comfort and you can accept modest compromises in wet braking and winter handling.


Manufacturer pages: Firestone and Toyo.

Test Profile

Toyo
Celsius AS2
Firestone
Multiseason 2
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2
Number of tests
14
13
3
4
Best position
#7
#6
#5
#2
Average position
11.6
10.9
7.3
5.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
61
1

Wet

Wet
Toyo Celsius AS2
57%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
74%
Wet handling
Toyo Celsius AS2
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Celsius AS2
75%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
75%
Wet braking
Toyo Celsius AS2
55%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
73%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Celsius AS2
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
70%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Celsius AS2
63%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
78%

Snow

Snow
Toyo Celsius AS2
61%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
78%
Snow traction
Toyo Celsius AS2
52%
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
75%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
76%
Snow handling
Toyo Celsius AS2
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
73%
Snow braking
Toyo Celsius AS2
69%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
84%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
85%
Snow cornering
Toyo Celsius AS2
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
76%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Celsius AS2
69%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
84%
Dry handling
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
82%
Dry braking
Toyo Celsius AS2
74%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Celsius AS2
57%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71%
Exterior noise
Toyo Celsius AS2
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
84%
Comfort
Toyo Celsius AS2
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
77%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Celsius AS2
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
61%
Rolling resistance
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
66%
Price/value
Toyo Celsius AS2
91%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
64%
Mileage
Toyo Celsius AS2
84%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison