18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Sava Intensa UHP

Here we compare two popular summer tyres, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 and the Firestone Roadhawk. Both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses making them suitable for different drivers' needs.


One key element to note is that the Sava Intensa UHP 2, which was rated 73% by us, has superseded the previous Sava Intensa UHP model. We haven't yet identified a newer model that replaces this tyre. The Sava Intensa UHP 2 excelled in a number of categories in various tests. Particularly, it held a solid position 17 out of 53 in the Autobild test, impressing with its value for money and performance in cross aquaplaning scenarios. Additionally, it ranked second in the ACE test, where it gained recognition for its dry handling ability, objective dry handling, wet circle cornering, objective wet handling, and its exterior noise.


On the contrary, in the ADAC test, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 secured the 12th position. Its strengths included good performance on dry road surfaces and lower exterior noise. However, it demonstrated a slight increase in tyre wear and weaknesses on wet surfaces.


Coming over to the Firestone Roadhawk, this tyre received a rating of 72% from us. It acquired the 13th position in the Autobild test. In the same test, it didn't have any particular features stand out, however, it secured 7th position in the ACE competition due to its low rolling resistance. Yet, it came last in the ADAC test where it presented weaknesses on dry road surfaces and a slightly increased wear. These tests made evident its excellent fuel efficiency but noted it struggled on wet surfaces.


In conclusion, both tyres exhibited different strengths and weaknesses. The Sava Intensa UHP 2 is a great option for those looking for good handling and a quieter ride. While the Firestone Roadhawk is more suited to those prioritizing fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance. Keep in mind that the Roadhawk might not be the best option for areas with frequent wet weather conditions due to its lower performance on wet surfaces.

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Sava
Intensa UHP
Number of tests
15
21
8
1
Best position
#2
#2
#8
#6
Average position
13.3
11.9
26.4
6.0
Latest test
2026
2024
2023
2016
Available sizes
76
164
161
24

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
60%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa UHP 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
58%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa UHP 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa UHP 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
69%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa UHP 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa UHP 2
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Dry braking
Sava Intensa UHP 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
57%
Dry handling
Sava Intensa UHP 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
68%
Dry driving behavior
Sava Intensa UHP 2
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa UHP 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Interior noise
Sava Intensa UHP 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
84%
Mileage
Sava Intensa UHP 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
72%
Rolling resistance
Sava Intensa UHP 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
90%
Price/value
Sava Intensa UHP 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison