18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP2 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

When it comes to selecting a reliable summer tyre, both Sava Intensa HP2 and Nokian WetProof catch the eye for various reasons. Yet, they offer different strengths and weaknesses which we will explore in this article. These insights are based on the tyre tests presented by ADAC and Autobild.


The Sava Intensa HP2, a product from Sava, it a successor to the popular Sava Intensa HP model. Despite this, the HP2 model has not seen a newer version to date. The tyre grabbed a score of 67% from our ratings. Yet, in the tyre tests considered, Sava Intensa HP2 struggled to secure top rankings. It secured the 12th position out of 18 in the ADAC test and 22nd out of 53 in the Autobild test. From the test data, it is depicted that the tyre is efficient and lightweight; however, it records weaknesses at driving safety and on both dry and wet roads. Environmental performance and slightly compromised tread life have also been noted as areas of improvement for this tyre.


On the contrary, the Nokian WetProof, manufactured by Nokian in Finland, has improved ratings and test positions compared to its counterpart. Our team gave this performer an impressive 74% rating. In the ADAC and Autobild tests, the tyre secured a noteworthy 6th position. The test summaries highlighted the well-balanced characteristics of WetProof and its good performance on both dry and wet roads, along with efficiency. Despite these strengths, there are still aspects to be improved: it was mentioned to be lacking in environmental performance, tread life, and sustainability.


Overall, in a head-to-head comparison, Nokian WetProof outperforms Sava Intensa HP2 in the majority of the categories, including overall ratings and test positions. While Sava Intensa HP2 is praised for its efficiency and lightness, its weaknesses in safety and environmental performance pose a significant downside. Nokian WetProof, well-balanced and performing well on all types of roads, seems like the superior choice here.


In conclusion, each of these tyres has its strengths and weaknesses. The choice between Sava's efficiency and Nokian's balance and performance will heavily depend on the individual driver's preferences and driving circumstances.

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP2
Nokian
WetProof
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
4
14
10
Best position
#12
#1
#2
Average position
18.3
5.6
6.0
Latest test
2024
2023
2026
Available sizes
22
47
104

Wet

Wet
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP2
75%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP2
88%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Costs

Costs
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison