Segment
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Sava (58%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Eskimo S3+ and Dunlop SP Winter Response 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the SP Winter Response 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ has C wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 has B rating.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Highly recommended2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet performance
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow performance
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry performance
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Interior noise
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 1,9 | 2,3 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 1,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Good | 1,8 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,3 | 1,9 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 | 36,8 | 28,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
