18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Pirelli P Zero Winter vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Pirelli
P Zero Winter
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
4
17
4
3
5
Best position
#9
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
12.0
1.7
3.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
85
111
80
40
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Pirelli P Zero Winter
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Pirelli P Zero Winter
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Pirelli P Zero Winter
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Pirelli P Zero Winter
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Pirelli P Zero Winter
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Pirelli P Zero Winter
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Offroad
Pirelli P Zero Winter
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Comfort
Pirelli P Zero Winter
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Pirelli P Zero Winter
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Pirelli P Zero Winter
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry
Pirelli P Zero Winter
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Pirelli P Zero Winter
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Pirelli P Zero Winter
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Costs
Pirelli P Zero Winter
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Pirelli P Zero Winter
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Snow
Pirelli P Zero Winter
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Pirelli P Zero Winter
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store