Segment
1. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Pirelli summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) has a better rating of 85% compared to 64% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. The first tyre test of Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) was done in 2025, compared to 2026 when was the Nokian Powerproof 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2026 225/40 R18 test, where both the P Zero (PZ5) and the Powerproof 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
| Nokian Powerproof 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R21 - R23 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
1. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Test winner2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
1. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Recommended2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 141 | 68 | 55 | 23 | 16 | 7 | |
| Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Rating: Recommended | 133 | 60 | 54 | 19 | 14 | 5 | |
| Nokian Powerproof 2 Rating: Recommended | 132 | 63 | 47 | 22 | 16 | 6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||