Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Pirelli (71%). But when it comes to comparing Pirelli CARRIER WINTER and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the CARRIER WINTER and the Blizzak W810 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Pirelli CARRIER WINTER dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
1. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Pirelli CARRIER WINTER Rating: Recommended | 3,3 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,7 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,0 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||