18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Nokian
WR SUV 3
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
4
14
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#2
Average position
4.3
12.0
5.5
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
62
111
700
36

Wet

Wet
Nokian WR SUV 3
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WR SUV 3
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Snow

Snow
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WR SUV 3
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Nokian WR SUV 3
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison