Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

Nokian

WR SUV 3

R15 – R21

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

WR SUV 3

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

4

5

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

4.3

12.0

3.3

2.8

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

62

111

40

139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian WR SUV 3

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Wet braking

Nokian WR SUV 3

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Wet handling

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian WR SUV 3

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Snow

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Dry

Nokian WR SUV 3

95%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Dry handling

Nokian WR SUV 3

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Dry braking

Nokian WR SUV 3

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Comfort

Nokian WR SUV 3

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Exterior noise

Nokian WR SUV 3

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Costs

Nokian WR SUV 3

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Rolling resistance

Nokian WR SUV 3

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Nokian WR SUV 4

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WS71

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

WR SUV 3

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison