18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
WR SUV 3
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
4
5
1
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
12.0
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
62
111
63
66

Wet

Wet
Nokian WR SUV 3
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WR SUV 3
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Snow

Snow
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WR SUV 3
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison