Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Nokian

WR SUV 3

R15 – R21

VS

Upper-middle

Hankook

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

WR SUV 3

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

1

4

3

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

4.3

1.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

62

27

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian WR SUV 3

88%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Nokian WR SUV 3

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian WR SUV 3

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Snow

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Dry

Nokian WR SUV 3

95%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Nokian WR SUV 3

93%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Nokian WR SUV 3

100%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Nokian WR SUV 3

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian WR SUV 3

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Nokian WR SUV 3

60%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian WR SUV 3

60%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Nokian WR SUV 4

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WS71

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

WR SUV 3

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison