18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Nokian
WR SUV 3
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
1
5
Best position
#1
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
62
27
63

Wet

Wet
Nokian WR SUV 3
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WR SUV 3
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Snow

Snow
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WR SUV 3
95%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
100%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison