18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
WR SUV 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
3
2
1
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
3.7
2.0
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
62
36
48
66

Wet

Wet
Nokian WR SUV 3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WR SUV 3
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Snow

Snow
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
76%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WR SUV 3
95%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
100%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison