18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Nokian
WR SUV 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
3
14
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
4.3
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
62
36
194

Wet

Wet
Nokian WR SUV 3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WR SUV 3
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Snow

Snow
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Lateral guidance on snow
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
Snow traction
Nokian WR SUV 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow cornering
Nokian WR SUV 3
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Snow handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WR SUV 3
95%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
100%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry lane changing
Nokian WR SUV 3
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Comfort
Nokian WR SUV 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Exterior noise
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison