Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Nokian

WR SUV 3

R15 – R21

VS

Premium

Continental

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

WR SUV 3

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

28

4

3

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

4.3

2.3

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

62

67

40

36

Wet

Nokian WR SUV 3

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian WR SUV 3

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Nokian WR SUV 3

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Snow

Nokian WR SUV 3

90%

Dry

Nokian WR SUV 3

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Nokian WR SUV 3

93%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Nokian WR SUV 3

100%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Nokian WR SUV 3

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Nokian WR SUV 3

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian WR SUV 3

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Nokian WR SUV 3

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian WR SUV 3

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Tyres for EV cars Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Nokian WR SUV 4

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WS71

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

Nokian WR SUV 3 vs Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Michelin Primacy 5

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

WR SUV 3

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison