Segment
1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR D4 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Vredestein (59%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR D4 and Vredestein Snowtrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the WR D4 and the Snowtrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR D4 is made in Finland and Snowtrac 5 is made in Netherlands.
| # | Nokian WR D4
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.042. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian WR D4 82%
Dry performance
2. Nokian WR D4 75%
Dry driving behavior
2. Nokian WR D4 71%
Dry handling
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian WR D4 74%
Wet braking
1. Nokian WR D4 68%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR D4 66%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian WR D4 75%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR D4 71%
Wet performance
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 93%
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 93%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 95%
Snow performance
1. Nokian WR D4 90%
Snow cornering
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian WR D4 71%
Interior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 66%
Comfort
2. Nokian WR D4 71%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
2. Nokian WR D4 88%
Mileage
1. Nokian WR D4 68%
Rolling resistance
1. Nokian WR D4 100%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
Ice lateral guidance
1. Nokian WR D4 82%
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 11 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
11
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,1 | ||||||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 8,1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Still recommended | 7,8 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,3 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 1,7 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 3,0 | 1,9 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38,9 | 27,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 2,7 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 415 | 144 | 136 | 144 | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended | 399 | 127 | 136 | 136 | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 362 | 111 | 109 | 142 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
