• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Nokian (60%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (55%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings.

# Nokian WR A4
/0%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
/64%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Fulda
DimensionsR16 - R21 R15 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

4

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-2+1-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22-2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Good
2-2-2+ 2+
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test30,324,3
Nokian WR A434,625,5
Fulda Kristall Control HP236,324,5
Show test details
Sportscars
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+1-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2+
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Still recommended
6,39,2 7,110
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Rating: Recommended
6,87,39,57,9
Show test details