18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Today, we are comparing two popular seasonal tyres: the Nokian WetProof and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. Manufactured by Nokian and Kleber respectively, these tyres provide safe, comfortable, and efficient summer driving.


Let's first delve into the Nokian WetProof. This tyre is noted by our experts for its balanced performance on both dry and wet roads. Also showing exemplary efficiency, it is constructed in Finland and does not have a successor as of yet. In the opinion of our testers, the tyre's downfalls lie in its environmental footprint, tread life, and sustainability. These factors lead to it earning an overall rating of 68% in our assessments.


Some of its remarkable standings in mutual tests include the 6th place out of 18 tyres in ADAC and a similar 6th place out of 53 tyres in AutoBild. AutoBild 2019 commends the tyre for being "balanced, good on dry and wet road, and efficient" but also mentions weaknesses in tread life, wear, and sustainability.


Turning to the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, this model boasts a higher average score of 74% by our reviewers, despite its undisclosed country of production. Praised for its stellar environmental footprint and performance in terms of tread life, abrasion, and efficiency, the tyre's weak points come to light on wet roads. However, it showcases good aquaplaning properties, short dry and wet braking distances, and comfortable and quiet ride, as noted in AutoBild 2022. AutoBild 2019 mentions that the tyre is "not quite balanced, weak on wet road", underlining its average wet surface performance.


The Dynaxer HP4 ranks 10th and 14th in the ADAC and AutoBild tests respectively. Its high ranking is bolstered by its excellent comfort, exterior noise level, and the fact that it does not have a predecessor model.


In conclusion, the Nokian WetProof shines when it comes to balanced performance and efficiency but falls short in terms of environmental impact and sustainability. On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 impresses with its environment-friendliness and longevity, but needs to tackle its performance on wet surfaces. In light of mutual test positions, the Nokian WetProof takes the lead in rankings, but the choice between these two tyres would ultimately be defined by the specific needs of the driver.

Test Profile

Nokian
WetProof
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
11
3
3
3
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.6
11.6
4.7
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2023
2024
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
47
121
126
40
40

Wet

Wet
Nokian WetProof
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WetProof
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WetProof
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Nokian WetProof
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet handling
Nokian WetProof
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WetProof
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Nokian WetProof
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Wet performance
Nokian WetProof
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Michelin Primacy 5
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WetProof
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Nokian WetProof
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Nokian WetProof
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian WetProof
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry performance
Nokian WetProof
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Nokian WetProof
86%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Interior noise
Nokian WetProof
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WetProof
60%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WetProof
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Nokian WetProof
56%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Fuel efficiency
Nokian WetProof
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison