Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a better rating of 72% compared to 59% of the Nokian WetProof. The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the WetProof and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WetProof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings. We also know where WetProof is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian WetProof
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Nokian WetProof | 101,3 | 102,2 | 100,4 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 101 | 100,6 | 101,4 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,0 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||