Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Powerproof and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| BFGoodrich Advantage
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1- | 2 | 3- | ||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||