18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
UltraContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
1
8
1
Best position
#2
#7
#3
#1
Average position
7.3
7.0
5.0
1.0
Latest test
2026
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
91
88
146
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
73%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
58%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Dry
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Comfort
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
64%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Costs
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.