Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Nankang (9%). The first tyre test of Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Wintrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/45 R18 test, where both the Winter Activa SV-2 and the Wintrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Nankang Winter Activa SV-2
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 Lowcost
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 Rating: Not recommended | 4 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Nankang Winter Activa SV-2 Rating: Not recommended | 3 | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||