18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Minerva F209 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Minerva) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Minerva (25%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 76% compared to 33% of the Minerva F209. The first tyre test of Minerva F209 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the F209 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

Minerva
F209
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
10
Best position
#29
#2
Average position
32.0
6.0
Latest test
2024
2026
Available sizes
113
117

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.