18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data



Today, we bring you a comprehensive comparison featuring two summer tyres, the Michelin Primacy 4 and the Vredestein ULTRAC. We'll be summarizing the results from rigorous tests carried out by several auto platforms, highlighting strengths and weaknesses for each tyre.

Michelin Primacy 4



Manufactured in ES, DE, PL, the touring type, Michelin Primacy 4 is a successor to Michelin Primacy 3. It scores an impressive 84% rating on our website, and has been replaced by the Michelin Primacy 4+.


In the Autobild tests, it came 8th out of 51 and demonstrated Dry handling and Comfort as its best features. Autozeitung rated it fourth out of ten, while ADAC ranked it third out of sixteen, praising its Dry Braking and Wet Circle Cornering capabilities. Overall, it is commended for its good handling qualities, good aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances, very high mileage, and low rolling resistance.

Vredestein ULTRAC



The Vredestein ULTRAC, made in HU, is a summer tyre that comes first equipment on the BMW 2-series Active Tourer. It has our website rating of 42%.


In the Autobild test, the ULTRAC scored an impressive 4th place out of 51. Best features were noted as Dry braking and Interior noise. Autozeitung placed the ULTRAC second out of ten, while in the ADAC test, it came 13 out of 16. Overall, it's recognized for its convincing safety reserves in aquaplaning, sporty dynamic handling, and short braking distances on both wet and dry tracks.

Conclusion



Overall, the Michelin Primacy 4 is a very good all-round summer tyre, performing consistently in all tests, with very few weaknesses. In contrast, while the Vredestein ULTRAC performs well in areas such as dry braking and interior noise, it falls short in areas such as fuel consumption and wear. Consequently, the Michelin Primacy 4 comes out on top in most comparisons.

Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 4
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
20
10
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
3.5
6.0
Latest test
2022
2026
Available sizes
384
104

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Michelin Primacy 4
74%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Vredestein ULTRAC
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Wet Handling
Michelin Primacy 4
63%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Primacy 4
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Primacy 4
69%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Dry Performance
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Vredestein ULTRAC
77%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Michelin Primacy 4
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
Michelin Primacy 4
92%
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Vredestein ULTRAC
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Ride Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Economy
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Vredestein ULTRAC
49%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
64%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Primacy 4
92%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Mileage
Michelin Primacy 4
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
38%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison