18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 3 vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage


The Michelin Primacy 3 and the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 are two premium summer tyres that have been widely recognized for their superior performance in varied testing conditions. It's worth mentioning that the Michelin Primacy 3 has been displaced by a newer model, the Michelin Primacy 4, while the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has been superseded by the Continental PremiumContact 6.


Compared to its continental counterpart, the Michelin Primacy 3 has held its ground in multiple tests, typically securing higher placements. In the ADAC and Autozeitung tests, for example, the Primacy 3 came in first out of 16 and 10 tyres, respectively, whereas the ContiPremiumContact 5 took the third and second positions.


However, it's important to note that the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 outperformed the Michelin Primacy 3 in the Autobild test, scoring 9th out of 50 tyres as opposed to the latter's 10th place. In the Firmenauto test though, the Primacy 3 was second while the ContiPremiumContact 5 was third.


In terms of strengths, the Michelin Primacy 3 is often praised for its excellent grip in both dry and wet conditions, as well as its durability. Conversely, its main weaknesses are slightly higher rolling resistance and noise levels. On the other hand, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 is lauded for its superb handling on wet roads, low rolling resistance, and comfort. Nonetheless, the tyre's reduced wear resistance can be seen as a drawback.


To sum up, although both tyres offer highly satisfactory performance, Michelin Primacy 3 generally performs slightly better in mutual tests. However, both have been replaced with newer models, so users might want to consider the Michelin Primacy 4 and the Continational PremiumContact 6 for their updated features and improved performance.


Test Profile

Michelin
Primacy 3
Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
10
14
21
14
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#8
Average position
6.1
3.8
11.9
13.4
Latest test
2018
2019
2024
2026
Available sizes
182
35
164
153

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 3
70%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Primacy 3
40%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Primacy 3
65%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Primacy 3
78%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Michelin Primacy 3
87%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 3
83%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry driving behavior
Michelin Primacy 3
80%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Dry handling
Michelin Primacy 3
80%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Primacy 3
85%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison