18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nexen N fera Sport

In this comparison, we will take a look at two popular summer tyres – the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and the Nokian Powerproof. Both tyres are designed to provide excellent performance in dry and wet conditions, but let's take a closer look at the strengths and weaknesses of each based on the data from various tyre tests conducted by different organizations.


The Michelin Pilot Sport 4, with an overall rating of 94%, has been praised for its impressive dry braking, dry handling, and wet handling. The tyre replaced the Michelin Pilot Sport 3 and has since been upgraded with a newer model, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5. Manufactured in Spain and Germany, the Pilot Sport 4 also performs well in wet conditions, excelling in tests such as aquaplaning resistance and longitudinal performance.


On the other hand, the Nokian Powerproof has an overall rating of 85% and is known for its safety and neutrality, even in wet conditions. Manufactured in Finland, this tyre also has good reserves for handling wet surfaces and offers precise control and responsiveness in dry corners. Despite these strengths, the Nokian Powerproof does have some limitations, including aquaplaning safety and a noticeable noise issue.


In the tests conducted by AutoMotorSport, out of the 11 tyres tested, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ranked 2nd, while the Nokian Powerproof came in at 7th. The Michelin tyre scored well in dry steering response, aquaplaning resistance, and both dry and wet handling. In contrast, the Nokian tyre only stood out in dry steering response.


According to Autozeitung, in a comparison of 10 tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ranked 4th, while the Nokian Powerproof came in 6th. The Michelin tyre received high praise for its dry braking performance.


In the Autobild tests, out of 11 tyres, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ranked 4th, while the Nokian Powerproof came in 7th. The Michelin tyre performed exceptionally in aquaplaning resistance and dry braking. The Nokian tyre, on the other hand, was recognized for its wet braking performance.


The ADAC tests featured 16 tyres, with the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 taking 2nd place and the Nokian Powerproof coming in 11th. The Michelin tyre excelled in dry braking performance and mileage, while the Nokian tyre was praised for its noise reduction and interior noise performance.


In conclusion, based on the test results, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 comes out as the better performer overall, especially in terms of handling, braking performance, and aquaplaning resistance. However, the Nokian Powerproof is a worthy alternative if you prefer a safer, more comfortable ride, as it performs well in wet conditions and offers a quieter experience.


For more information on these tyres and other options, please visit Michelin and Nokian.

Test Profile

Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Nokian
Powerproof
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen
N fera Sport
Number of tests
19
11
5
36
15
15
17
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
2.1
7.5
7.0
3.1
9.0
2.3
9.3
Latest test
2022
2022
2020
2023
2025
2022
2025
Available sizes
183
53
185
296
225
187
96

Wet

Wet
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Nexen N fera Sport
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
92%
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
86%
Nexen N fera Sport
76%
Wet handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
89%
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
92%
Nexen N fera Sport
60%
Wet braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
86%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
84%
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Nexen N fera Sport
65%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
78%
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
61%
Wet side guide
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
76%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
Nexen N fera Sport
76%
Wet performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
86%
Nokian Powerproof
77%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Nexen N fera Sport
72%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87%
Nokian Powerproof
83%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
72%
Dry braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
90%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Nexen N fera Sport
81%
Dry handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
91%
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Nexen N fera Sport
61%
Dry lane changing
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
92%
Nokian Powerproof
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Nexen N fera Sport
81%
Dry steering response
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
90%
Nokian Powerproof
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Nexen N fera Sport
63%
Dry performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
83%
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
82%
Dry driving behavior
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
77%
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
79%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
76%
Nokian Powerproof
65%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
77%
Nexen N fera Sport
64%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
75%
Nokian Powerproof
70%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
57%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
66%
Nexen N fera Sport
59%
Mileage
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
84%
Nokian Powerproof
54%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Nexen N fera Sport
62%
Price/value
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
56%
Nokian Powerproof
50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Fuel efficiency
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87%
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
84%
Nexen N fera Sport
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
78%
Nokian Powerproof
76%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Nexen N fera Sport
74%
Exterior noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
80%
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Nexen N fera Sport
81%
Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
81%
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
80%
Nexen N fera Sport
79%
Interior noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
76%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
78%
Nexen N fera Sport
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2020245/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2020245/45 R18View
ADACADAC
Summer
2020225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison