Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Premium

Michelin

Pilot Sport 4 S

VS

ION Evo

Roadhawk 2

8.0

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Pilot Sport 4 S

ION Evo

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

10

1

6

Best position

#1

#3

Average position

2.1

1.0

4.7

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

195

64

146

Wet

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Wet braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Wet handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Dry

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Dry handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Costs

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Pilot Sport 4 S

ION Evo

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison