18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
4
1
6
Best position
#5
#1
#3
Average position
10.3
1.0
4.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
64
146

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison