Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

Roadhawk 2

8.0

R16 – R22

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

ION Evo

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

4

1

6

Best position

#5

#1

#3

Average position

10.3

1.0

4.7

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

—

64

146

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Energy Saver +

ION Evo

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison