18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

In the grand scheme of summer tyre tests, the Michelin Energy Saver + and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance have both shown some interesting strengths and weaknesses. Our comparative analysis of these two tyres is based on their demonstrated performance in tests by Autobild and ADAC.


Michelin Energy Saver +


The Michelin Energy Saver + achieved a respectable position in the tyre tests. With our rating of 52%, this tyre, which has not been replaced with a newer model, snagged the 15th position out of 51 tyres tested by Autobild and 10th out of 16 in the ADAC test. While the individual data points of these tests were not specified, overall Michelin's performance signifies a reliable mid-range summer tyre. Michelin, the manufacturer, has a longstanding reputation for quality.


Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance scored higher in our rating with 79%. This tyre achieved the 11th position out of 51 in the Autobild test and an impressive 4th position out of 16 in the ADAC test. Furthermore, it showed a notable performance in aquaplaning - both cross and longitudinal - according to Autobild, and exceptional dry driving behavior and cornering in wet conditions as per ADAC. Made in Slovenia, this model has been replaced with the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2. The upgrade holds promise for even better performance. Goodyear, the manufacturer, is recognized for advancing tyre performance with consistent innovation.


Summary and Verdict


Both tyres have their merits, with Michelin offering a reliable and stable performance, and Goodyear standing out especially in wet conditions and overall driving behavior. However, if we consider the overall positions and performance data from all the tests, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance takes the flag in this head-to-head comparison. It is well worth considering the successor - the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 - when deciding on your next set of tyres.

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
16
3
3
1
Best position
#5
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
10.3
5.5
3.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
40
34
64

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison