18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

In the grand scheme of summer tyre tests, the Michelin Energy Saver + and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance have both shown some interesting strengths and weaknesses. Our comparative analysis of these two tyres is based on their demonstrated performance in tests by Autobild and ADAC.


Michelin Energy Saver +


The Michelin Energy Saver + achieved a respectable position in the tyre tests. With our rating of 52%, this tyre, which has not been replaced with a newer model, snagged the 15th position out of 51 tyres tested by Autobild and 10th out of 16 in the ADAC test. While the individual data points of these tests were not specified, overall Michelin's performance signifies a reliable mid-range summer tyre. Michelin, the manufacturer, has a longstanding reputation for quality.


Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance scored higher in our rating with 79%. This tyre achieved the 11th position out of 51 in the Autobild test and an impressive 4th position out of 16 in the ADAC test. Furthermore, it showed a notable performance in aquaplaning - both cross and longitudinal - according to Autobild, and exceptional dry driving behavior and cornering in wet conditions as per ADAC. Made in Slovenia, this model has been replaced with the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2. The upgrade holds promise for even better performance. Goodyear, the manufacturer, is recognized for advancing tyre performance with consistent innovation.


Summary and Verdict


Both tyres have their merits, with Michelin offering a reliable and stable performance, and Goodyear standing out especially in wet conditions and overall driving behavior. However, if we consider the overall positions and performance data from all the tests, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance takes the flag in this head-to-head comparison. It is well worth considering the successor - the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 - when deciding on your next set of tyres.

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
16
18
4
3
5
3
Best position
#5
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
5.5
6.1
12.0
3.7
2.2
3.3
Latest test
2018
2023
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
47
111
34
63
40

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison