18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In the grand scheme of summer tyre tests, the Michelin Energy Saver + and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance have both shown some interesting strengths and weaknesses. Our comparative analysis of these two tyres is based on their demonstrated performance in tests by Autobild and ADAC.


Michelin Energy Saver +


The Michelin Energy Saver + achieved a respectable position in the tyre tests. With our rating of 52%, this tyre, which has not been replaced with a newer model, snagged the 15th position out of 51 tyres tested by Autobild and 10th out of 16 in the ADAC test. While the individual data points of these tests were not specified, overall Michelin's performance signifies a reliable mid-range summer tyre. Michelin, the manufacturer, has a longstanding reputation for quality.


Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance scored higher in our rating with 79%. This tyre achieved the 11th position out of 51 in the Autobild test and an impressive 4th position out of 16 in the ADAC test. Furthermore, it showed a notable performance in aquaplaning - both cross and longitudinal - according to Autobild, and exceptional dry driving behavior and cornering in wet conditions as per ADAC. Made in Slovenia, this model has been replaced with the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2. The upgrade holds promise for even better performance. Goodyear, the manufacturer, is recognized for advancing tyre performance with consistent innovation.


Summary and Verdict


Both tyres have their merits, with Michelin offering a reliable and stable performance, and Goodyear standing out especially in wet conditions and overall driving behavior. However, if we consider the overall positions and performance data from all the tests, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance takes the flag in this head-to-head comparison. It is well worth considering the successor - the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 - when deciding on your next set of tyres.

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Number of tests
4
16
Best position
#5
#3
Average position
10.3
5.5
Latest test
2018
2023
Available sizes
153

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
90%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Wet Braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Wet Handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
90%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
92%
Dry Performance
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
96%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Dry Handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
96%
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
68%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Noise Exterior
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Noise Interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
72%
Economy
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
74%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
72%
Fuel Efficiency
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
62%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2018195/65 R15View
ADACADAC
Summer
2017195/65 R15View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison