18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
36
5
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
3.1
2.2
Latest test
2018
2023
2025
Available sizes
296
63

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison