18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk
Number of tests
2
1
21
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
1.5
1.0
11.9
Latest test
2024
2025
2024
Available sizes
54
66
165

Wet

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%

Snow

Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%

Dry

Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%

Costs

Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison