18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
4
5
23
3
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
1.5
3.3
2.2
6.7
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
54
40
63
107
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Snow
Confidence
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Snow traction
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Snow braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Dry
Confidence
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comfort
Confidence
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Confidence
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store