18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
2
18
14
4
5
Best position
#1
#1
#8
#2
#1
Average position
1.5
6.1
13.4
3.3
2.8
Latest test
2024
2024
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
54
47
153
40
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store