18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
2
21
18
1
4
5
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
1.5
11.9
6.1
1.0
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2024
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
54
165
47
66
40
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store