18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Continental (73%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 89% compared to 53% of the Continental UltraContact. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental UltraContact has A rating.

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Continental
UltraContact
Number of tests
2
1
Best position
#1
#7
Average position
1.5
7.0
Latest test
2024
2023
Available sizes
54
88

Wet

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Continental UltraContact
71%

Snow

Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%

Dry

Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Continental UltraContact
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%

Costs

Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Continental UltraContact
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison