18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
2
14
18
4
5
Best position
#1
#8
#1
#2
#1
Average position
1.5
13.4
6.1
3.3
2.8
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
54
153
47
40
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Snow
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Dry
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Costs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store