Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Continental VanContact Winter Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Continental (83%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin AGILIS ALPIN and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the AGILIS ALPIN and the VanContact Winter were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental VanContact Winter also have B wet ratings.
| # | Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Continental VanContact Winter Premium
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||