18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Linglong Sport Master Winter vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Linglong
Sport Master Winter
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
6
4
18
4
6
5
Best position
#5
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
Average position
11.2
12.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
2.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
26
111
47
40
146
63

Wet

Wet
Linglong Sport Master Winter
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Linglong Sport Master Winter
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
Linglong Sport Master Winter
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Linglong Sport Master Winter
34%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Linglong Sport Master Winter
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Linglong Sport Master Winter
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Sport Master Winter
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Linglong Sport Master Winter
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Linglong Sport Master Winter
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry lane changing
Linglong Sport Master Winter
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Snow

Snow
Linglong Sport Master Winter
59%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Sport Master Winter
46%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Linglong Sport Master Winter
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Linglong Sport Master Winter
44%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Sport Master Winter
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Comfort
Linglong Sport Master Winter
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Exterior noise
Linglong Sport Master Winter
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison