18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Linglong Grip Master 4S vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Linglong
Grip Master 4S
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
5
4
18
1
3
5
4
Best position
#4
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
12.6
12.0
6.1
1.0
3.7
2.2
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
85
111
47
66
36
63
40

Wet

Wet
Linglong Grip Master 4S
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Linglong Grip Master 4S
49%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet braking
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet circle cornering
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Snow

Snow
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Linglong Grip Master 4S
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Linglong Grip Master 4S
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Grip Master 4S
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry handling
Linglong Grip Master 4S
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry braking
Linglong Grip Master 4S
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Grip Master 4S
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Linglong Grip Master 4S
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Linglong Grip Master 4S
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison