18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Linglong Grip Master 4S vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Linglong
Grip Master 4S
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
4
18
5
1
4
3
Best position
#4
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
12.6
12.0
6.1
2.2
1.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
85
111
47
63
66
40
36

Wet

Wet
Linglong Grip Master 4S
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Linglong Grip Master 4S
49%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Snow

Snow
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%

Costs

Costs
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Linglong Grip Master 4S
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Linglong Grip Master 4S
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dry

Dry
Linglong Grip Master 4S
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Linglong Grip Master 4S
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Linglong Grip Master 4S
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Linglong Grip Master 4S
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Linglong Grip Master 4S
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Linglong Grip Master 4S
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison