Comparison: Linglong Grip Master 4S vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Linglong

Grip Master 4S

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Grip Master 4S

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

10

14

3

Best position

#4

#2

#8

#2

Average position

12.6

6.0

13.4

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

85

109

153

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Linglong Grip Master 4S

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Linglong Grip Master 4S

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Linglong Grip Master 4S

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Linglong Grip Master 4S

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Linglong Grip Master 4S

49%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Linglong Grip Master 4S

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Snow

Linglong Grip Master 4S

56%

Costs

Linglong Grip Master 4S

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Linglong Grip Master 4S

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Linglong Grip Master 4S

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Linglong Grip Master 4S

55%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Linglong Grip Master 4S

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Linglong Grip Master 4S

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Linglong Grip Master 4S

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry

Linglong Grip Master 4S

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Linglong Grip Master 4S

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Linglong Grip Master 4S

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Browse by brand

Comparison: Linglong Grip Master 4S vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Grip Master 4S

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison