Comparison: Linglong Grip Master 4S vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Linglong

Grip Master 4S

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Grip Master 4S

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

14

10

3

Best position

#4

#8

#2

Average position

12.6

13.4

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

85

153

109

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Linglong Grip Master 4S

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Linglong Grip Master 4S

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Linglong Grip Master 4S

49%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Linglong Grip Master 4S

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Linglong Grip Master 4S

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Linglong Grip Master 4S

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Snow

Linglong Grip Master 4S

56%

Costs

Linglong Grip Master 4S

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Linglong Grip Master 4S

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Linglong Grip Master 4S

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Linglong Grip Master 4S

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Linglong Grip Master 4S

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Linglong Grip Master 4S

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Linglong Grip Master 4S

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Dry

Linglong Grip Master 4S

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Linglong Grip Master 4S

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Linglong Grip Master 4S

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Browse by brand

Comparison: Linglong Grip Master 4S vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Grip Master 4S

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison