Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Linglong (45%). The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Green-Max
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 121 | 75 | 121 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 37,7 | 33,3 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 32 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
