Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Linglong (43%). The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Green-Max
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Test winner | 264 | 137 | 127 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 37,7 | 33,3 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||