Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Linglong (43%). The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Green-Max
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Highly recommended | 247 | 118 | 129 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 37,7 | 33,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,6 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
