Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Linglong (43%). The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max HP010 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Green-Max HP010 and the Turanza T005 were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max HP010
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory
2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Linglong Green-Max HP010 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||