Comparison: Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Budget

Laufenn

I FIT Plus

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

I FIT Plus

Advantage

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

6

14

3

6

Best position

#10

#8

#2

#3

Average position

14.5

13.4

3.7

4.7

Latest test

2023

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

—

153

36

146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Laufenn I FIT Plus

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Laufenn I FIT Plus

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Wet handling

Laufenn I FIT Plus

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Laufenn I FIT Plus

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet braking

Laufenn I FIT Plus

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Wet circle cornering

Laufenn I FIT Plus

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Snow

Laufenn I FIT Plus

80%

Costs

Laufenn I FIT Plus

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Mileage

Laufenn I FIT Plus

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Price/value

Laufenn I FIT Plus

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Rolling resistance

Laufenn I FIT Plus

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Comfort

Laufenn I FIT Plus

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Laufenn I FIT Plus

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Comfort

Laufenn I FIT Plus

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Dry

Laufenn I FIT Plus

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry braking

Laufenn I FIT Plus

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Dry handling

Laufenn I FIT Plus

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

I FIT Plus

Advantage

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison