Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210

Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Firestone Multiseason 2 — a compact comparison of two budget-friendly tyres that appear on multiple Autobild tests. Below you’ll find a concise summary of test positions, aggregated strengths and weaknesses and a clear verdict to help buyers choose the better option for their priorities.

Laufenn G Fit 4S (manufacturer: Laufenn) carries our overall score of 62% and is classified as an allround tyre. The Firestone Multiseason 2 (manufacturer: Firestone) scored 56% and is presented as a winter/multiseason option. Neither model is currently listed as replaced by a newer tyre.

Where they placed in independent tests

• Autobild (32 tyres): Firestone finished better (position 16) than Laufenn (position 21).


• AUTOBILD (37 tyres): Laufenn placed better (17) than Firestone (22).


• Autobild 2025 summaries highlight the Laufenn as a “Nässespezialist mit überzeugendem Preis‑Leistungs‑Verhältnis” (wet specialist with convincing value) while the Firestone is praised for short snow and wet braking, high mileage and low rolling resistance, but criticized for limited lateral control on snow and reduced aquaplaning reserves.

Aggregated strengths — Laufenn G Fit 4S

• Wet performance: repeatedly noted for strong wet handling, wet circle cornering and overall grip in damp conditions.


• Dry handling: good behaviour on dry roads for its price class.


• Value for money: consistently highlighted as a cost-effective choice in tests.

Aggregated weaknesses — Laufenn G Fit 4S

• Not a standout on snow-specific metrics in the available summaries (better as an all‑round/wet specialist).


• Overall score (62%) places it above Firestone but still mid‑range versus premium competitors.

Aggregated strengths — Firestone Multiseason 2

• Snow and wet braking: short stopping distances on snow and wet surfaces were repeatedly praised.


• Longevity and efficiency: high mileage potential and low rolling resistance make it attractive for economy‑minded drivers.

Aggregated weaknesses — Firestone Multiseason 2

• Handling compromises: tests note mediocre lateral guidance on snow and reduced safety margins in curve aquaplaning.


• Dry braking: extended stopping distances on dry asphalt compared with peers.


• Lower overall rating (56%) reflects these trade‑offs despite its clear strengths.

Head-to-head verdict
Results are mixed depending on what the test emphasised: in one Autobild run the Firestone scored higher, while in another the Laufenn came out ahead. Looking across available tests and our aggregate ratings, the Laufenn G Fit 4S emerges as the more balanced tyre overall — particularly for drivers who prioritise wet performance and value. The Firestone Multiseason 2 is a strong pick if your priority is short snow/wet braking, fuel efficiency and tread life, but be aware of its compromises in lateral stability on snow, aquaplaning reserves and dry braking.

Choose Laufenn for balanced wet-road confidence and cost‑effectiveness; choose Firestone if snow braking, low rolling resistance and long mileage are your top priorities, and you accept some trade‑offs in handling and dry stopping distances.